DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HCG ©
Docket No. NR5148-14
11 Mar 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on ;
10 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC ltr 5420 Ser |
N1/1263 dtd 22 Dec.14, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Per Training Orders, dated 22 June
2006, you were assigned to the Voluntary Training Unit (VTU) effective
12 May 2006. In April of 2007, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
“ruled and found you fit for continued duty as a Reservist. On 10
September 2007, a message was issued by COMNAVPERSCOM stating that you
were qualified to be retained in the Reserves and that you were to be
transferred to an INCONUS Unit. Per phone conversation with CNRFC,
you were never transferred. Regardless, your credentials as a Nurse
Corps Officer had lapsed effective 2 February 2007. Therefore, any
time that you served was not served in a pay status. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence
is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its
decision in your case. In this regard, it is important to keep in
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records.
Docket No. NR5148-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRFC ltr 5420 Ser N1/1263. dtd 22 Dec 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7180 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Letter 5420 Ser N1/1263 dated a a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4448 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR4448-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00121-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Ltr 5420 Ser N1/918 dated 30 July 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00635-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Ltr 5420 Ser N1/957 dated 3 August 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0941-13
A three-member pane] of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with - all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is ‘on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08830 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0583 dtd 22 May 13 and CNRFC Email dtd 25 Jul 13, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5730 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2891-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0846 dtd 24 Jul 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09526 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/0654 d@td 11 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.